6. And even though Americans seemed to work extraordinarily hard, their pursuit of entertainment turned media and leisure into multibillion-dollar industries.
=¼´Ê¹ÃÀ¹úÈ˹¤×÷Ê±ËÆºõÊǸñÍâÇÚ·ÜŬÁ¦µÄ£¬¿ÉËûÃǶÔÓéÀÖµÄ×·ÇóȴʹµÃËûÃǽ«Ã½ÌåºÍÏÐϾת±ä³ÉÁËÓ¯ÀûÊýÊ®ÒÚÃÀÔªµÄ²úÒµ¡£ Para. 2
1. By most standards, then, you would have to say that Americans are better off now than they were in the middle of the last century.
=ÄÇô£¬¸ù¾Ý´ó¶àÊý±ê×¼ºâÁ¿£¬Äã»á˵£¬ÏÖÔÚµÄÃÀ¹úÈ˱ÈÉϸöÊÀ¼ÍÖÐÒ¶¸»Ô£µÃ¶à¡£
2. Oddly, though, if you ask Americans how happy they are, you find that they are no happier than they were in 1946 (which is when formal surveys of happiness started).
=È»¶ø£¬Ææ¹ÖµÄÊÇ£¬Èç¹ûÄãÎÊÃÀ¹úÈËÓжàÐÒ¸££¬Äã»á·¢ÏÖ£¬ËûÃDz¢²»±È1946ÄêʱÐÒ¸££¨1946ÄêÕýʽ¿ªÊ¼¶ÔÐÒ¸£×´¿ö½øÐе÷²é£©¡£ 3. In fact, the percentage of people who say they are ¡°very happy¡± has fallen slightly since the early 1970s ----- even though the income of people born in 1940 has, on average, increased by 116 percent over the course of their working lives.
=ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬ÄÇЩ˵×Ô¼º¡°·Ç³£ÐÒ¸£¡±µÄÈËËùÕ¼µÄ±ÈÀý×Ô20ÊÀ¼Í70Äê´úÔçÆÚÒÔÀ´Ò»Ö±ÎÈÖÐÓнµ¡ª¡ª¾¡¹Ü20ÊÀ¼Í40Äê´ú³öÉúµÄÈ˵ÄÊÕÈëÔÚËûÃǵŤ×÷ÉúÑÄÖÐÆ½¾ùÔö³¤ÁË116%¡£
4.You can find similar data for most developed countries. =Äã¿ÉÒÔÔÚ´ó¶àÊý·¢´ï¹ú¼ÒÕÒµ½ÏàËÆµÄÊý¾Ý¡£ Para. 3
1. The relationship between happiness and technology has been an eternal subject for social critics and philosophers since the advent of the Industrial Revolution.
=×Ô¹¤Òµ¸ïÃü³öÏÖÒÔÀ´£¬ÐÒ¸£Óë¼¼ÊõÖ®¼äµÄ¹ØÏµÒ»Ö±ÊÇÉç»áÅúÆÀ¼ÒºÍÕÜѧ¼ÒÃdz¤ÆÚÑо¿µÄ¿ÎÌâ¡£
2. But it¡¯s been left largely unexamined by economists and social scientists.
=È»¶ø£¬Õâ¸ö¿ÎÌâ»ù±¾ÉÏ»¹Ã»ÓÐÊܵ½¾¼Ãѧ¼ÒºÍÉç»á¿ÆÑ§¼ÒÃǵĹØ×¢¡£ 3. The truly groundbreaking work on the relationship between prosperity and well-being was done by the economist Richard Easterlin, who in 1974 wrote a famous paper entitled ¡°Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?¡±
=¾¼Ãѧ¼ÒÀí²éµÂ?ÒÁË¹ÌØÁÖÔÚ¾¼Ã·±ÈÙºÍÐÒ¸£µÄ¹ØÏµ·½Ãæ½øÐÐÁ˾ßÓпªÍØÐÔµÄÑо¿£¬²¢ÓÚ1974Äê·¢±íÁËһƪÌâΪ¡°¾¼ÃÔö³¤¸Ä±äÈËÀàÃüÔËÂ𣿡±µÄÖøÃûÂÛÎÄ¡£
4. Easterlin showed that when it came to developed countries, there was no real correlation between a nation¡¯s income level and its citizens¡¯ happiness.
=ÒÁË¹ÌØÁÖ±íÃ÷£¬¾Í·¢´ï¹ú¼Ò¶øÑÔ£¬Ò»¸ö¹ú¼ÒµÄÊÕÈëºÍ¹úÃñµÄÐÒ¸£Ö®¼ä²¢Ã»ÓÐÕæÕýµÄÏ໥¹ØÏµ¡£
5. Money, Easterlin argued, could not buy happiness ----- at least not after a certain point.
=ÒÁË¹ÌØÁÖÈÏΪ£¬½ðÇ®Âò²»µ½ÐÒ¸£¡ª¡ªÖÁÉÙ ½ðÇ®´ïµ½ÁËÒ»¶¨³Ì¶ÈÒÔºóÊÇÈç´Ë¡£
6. Easterlin showed that though poverty was strongly correlated with misery, once a country was solidly middle-class, getting wealthier did not seem to make its citizens any happier.
=ÒÁË¹ÌØÁÖ±íÃ÷£¬¾¡¹ÜƶÇîÓë¿àÄÑÃܲ»¿É·Ö£¬µ«ÊÇ£¬Ò»¸ö¹ú¼ÒÒ»µ©´ïµ½Îȶ¨µÄÖвú½×¼¶Ë®Æ½£¬¸ü¸»ÓÐÒ»Ð©ËÆºõ¾Í²»»áʹÆä¹úÃñ¸Ðµ½¸ü¶àµÄÐÒ¸£ÁË¡£ Para. 4
1. This seems to be close to a universal phenomenon. =Õâ½üºõÊÇÒ»ÖÖÆÕ±éÏÖÏó¡£
2. In fact, one of happiness scholars¡¯ most important insights is that people adapt very quickly to good news.
=ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬Ñо¿ÐÒ¸£µÄѧÕßÃÇ×îÖØÒªµÄ¹ÛµãÖ®Ò»ÊÇ£ºÈËÃǶԺÃÏûÏ¢ºÜ¿ì±ãϰÒÔΪ³£¡£
3. Take lottery winners for example. One famous study showed that although winners were very, very happy when they won, their extreme excitement quickly evaporated, and after a while their moods and sense of well-being were indistinguishable from what they had been before the victory.
=ÄÃ²ÊÆ±Öн±ÕßΪÀý°É¡£Ò»ÏîÖØÒªµÄÑо¿±íÃ÷£¬¾¡¹Ü²ÊƱÖн±ÕßÖн±Ê±»á¸Ðµ½·Ç³£·Ç³£ÐÒ¸££¬¿ÉÕâÀàÐ˷ܺܿì¾ÍÏûÊÅÁË¡£Ò»¶Îʱ¼äÖ®ºó£¬ËûÃǵÄÐÄÇéºÍÐÒ¸£¸ÐÓëÖн±Ö®Ç°²¢Ã»Ê²Ã´Çø±ð¡£ Para. 5
1. So, too, with technology: no matter how dramatic a new innovation is, no matter how much easier it makes our lives, it is very easy to take it for granted.
=ÈËÃǶԴý¼¼ÊõµÄ̬¶ÈÒ²ÊÇÒ»ÑùµÄ£ºÎÞÂÛÒ»ÖÖÐÂÊÂÎï¶àôÒýÈËעĿ£¬Ò²ÎÞÂÛËüʹÎÒÃǵÄÉú»î±äµÃ¶àÃ´ÊæÊÊ£¬ÈËÃǺܿì¾Í»áÈÏΪÕâÊÇÀíËùµ±È»µÄÊÂÇé¡£
2. You can see this principle at work in the world of technology every day, as things that once seemed miraculous soon become common and, worse, frustrating when they don¡¯t work perfectly.