Óã²Ë¹²Éú

Vvv Òª

±¾ÊÔÑéÒÔÓã¨C²Ë¹²ÉúºÍÉúÎïÐõÍÅË®Öʵ÷¿Ø¼¼ÊõΪÀíÂÛ»ù´¡£¬³ØÌÁÉèÖò»Í¬¸²¸ÇÂÊ(5%ºÍ10%)µÄˮ޳²Ë¸¡´²£¬Í¨¹ý¶¨Ê±¼à²âË®Öʺ͸¡ÓÎÉúÎï±ä»¯£¬Ì½ÌÖÁËˮ޳²Ë¸¡´²¶ÔË®Öʺ͸¡ÓÎÉúÎïµÄÓ°Ï죻Ïò³ØÌÁÌí¼ÓÀíÂÛÌí¼ÓÁ¿100%¡¢75%ºÍ50%µÄ̼Դ(ÌÇÃÛ)£¬Í¨¹ý¶¨Ê±¼à²âË®Öʺ͸¡ÓÎÉúÎï±ä»¯£¬Ì½ÌÖÁË̼Դ(ÌÇÃÛ)Ìí¼Ó¶ÔË®Öʺ͸¡ÓÎÉúÎïµÄÓ°ÏìÒÔ¼°È·¶¨ÁË̼Դ(ÌÇÃÛ)µÄÊÊÒËÌí¼ÓÁ¿£¬Ö¼ÔÚΪÓã¨C²Ë¹²ÉúºÍÉúÎïÐõÍÅË®Öʵ÷¿Ø¼¼ÊõÔÚÎ÷±±µØÇøÑÎ¼î³ØÌÁµÄÍÆ¹ãÓ¦ÓÃÌṩһ¶¨µÄ¼¼Êõ²Î¿¼ºÍÀíÂÛÒÀ¾Ý¡£Ö÷Òª½á¹ûÈçÏ£º

(1) ÔÚ³ØÌÁÖÃÈëˮ޳²Ë¸¡´²ºó£¬Ë®Ìå͸Ã÷¶ÈÃ÷ÏÔÌá¸ß£¬DOˮƽ±£³ÖÔÚ3 mg/LÒÔÉÏ£¬µ«¶ÔˮΡ¢pHºÍµçµ¼ÂʵÄÓ°Ïì½ÏС£»¸¡´²Ë®Þ³²Ë¶ÔË®ÌåNH4+-N¡¢NO3--N¡¢NO2--N¡¢TN¡¢TPÒÔ¼°CODµÄ×î´óÈ¥³ýÂÊ·Ö±ðΪ58.2%¡¢34.8%¡¢53.8%¡¢9.46%¡¢39.3%ºÍ31.3%£¬Õû¸öÊÔÑéÆÚ¼äÉèÖø¡´²µÄÊÔÑ鳨ÌÁË®ÌåNH4+-N¡¢NO3--N¡¢NO2--N¡¢TN¡¢TPºÍCODº¬Á¿Æ½¾ùÖµ¾ùÏÔÖøµÍÓÚ¶ÔÕÕÌÁ(P<0.05)¡£

ÊÔÑéÌÁ¸¡ÓÎÖ²ÎïÃܶȡ¢ÉúÎïÁ¿ºÍ¸¡Óζ¯ÎïÃܶȾùÏÔÖøµÍÓÚ¶ÔÕÕÌÁ(P<0.05)£¬µ«¸¡Óζ¯ÎïÉúÎïÁ¿ÏÔÖø¸ßÓÚ¶ÔÕÕÌÁ(P<0.05)£»ÊÔÑéÌÁ¸¡ÓÎÖ²ÎïShannon-Weaver¶àÑùÐÔÖ¸ÊýHºÍPielou¾ùÔȶÈÖ¸ÊýJ¾ùÏÔÖø¸ßÓÚ¶ÔÕÕÌÁÌÁ(P<0.05)£¬¸¡´²¸²¸ÇÂÊΪ10%µÄÊÔÑéÌÁ¸¡Óζ¯ÎïShannon-Weaver¶àÑùÐÔÖ¸ÊýHºÍPielou¾ùÔȶÈÖ¸ÊýJÏÔÖø¸ßÓÚ¶ÔÕÕÌÁ(P<0.05)¡£

²»Í¬¸²¸ÇÂʵÄˮ޳²Ë¸¡´²¾ù¿ÉÓÐЧ¸ÄÉÆË®ÖÊ£¬µ«10%¸²¸ÇÂʵĸ¡´²¶ÔË®ÖʵĸÄÉÆÐ§¹û½Ï5%¸²¸ÇÂʵĸ¡´²ºÃ¡£

(2) Ìí¼Ó²»Í¬Á¿µÄÌÇÃÛ¾ù¿ÉÌá¸ßË®Ìå͸Ã÷¶È¡¢½µµÍCOD£¬µ«¶ÔTPº¬Á¿ÎÞÏÔÖøÓ°Ïì¡£ÌÇÃÛÌí¼ÓÁ¿100%¡¢75%ºÍ50%µÄ3¿ÚÊÔÑéÌÁË®ÌåNH4+-N¡¢NO3--NºÍNO2--Nº¬Á¿½Ï¶ÔÕÕÌÁ·Ö±ð½µµÍ58.20%¡¢77.48%¡¢39.81%ºÍ25.71%¡¢31.42%¡¢21.92%ÒÔ¼°52.94%¡¢76.19%¡¢47.82%£¬²îÒìÏÔÖø¡£

ÌÇÃÛÌí¼Ó¶Ô³ØÌÁÀ¶ÔåÓ°Ïì½ÏÃ÷ÏÔ£¬ÊÔÑéÌÁÀ¶ÔåÃܶȺÍÉúÎïÁ¿·Ö±ðΪ(812.5¡«1263.0)¡Á104 ind./LºÍ25.34¡«54.31 mg/L£¬¶ÔÕÕÌÁÀ¶ÔåÃܶȺÍÉúÎïÁ¿·Ö±ðΪ(1079.2¡«1216.5) ¡Á104 ind./LºÍ34.01¡«58.54 mg/L£¬²îÒìÏÔÖø(P<0.05)¡£ÌÇÃÛÌí¼Ó

I

Vvv Á¿100%ºÍ75%µÄ³ØÌÁ¸¡Óζ¯ÎïShannon-Weaver¶àÑùÐÔÖ¸Êý·Ö±ðϽµ15.18%ºÍ16.83%£¬ÏÔÖøµÍÓÚ¶ÔÕÕÌÁ32.56%µÄϽµËÙ¶È(P<0.05)¡£

×ÛºÏÈÏΪ£¬³ØÌÁÖÐÌí¼ÓÀíÂÛÁ¿100%ºÍ75%µÄÌÇÃÛ¾ù¿É½µµÍÓк¦ÎïÖÊŨ¶È¡¢ÏÞÖÆÀ¶ÔåµÄ´óÁ¿ÔöÖ³¡¢Ìá¸ß¸¡ÓÎÉúÎï¶àÑùÐÔ»ò¼õ»ºÆäϽµËÙ¶È£¬´ïµ½»î»¯Ë®Ìå¡¢¸ÄÉÆË®ÖʵÄЧ¹û£¬ÈÏΪÌí¼ÓÀíÂÛÁ¿75%µÄÌÇÃÛ¸ü¾­¼ÃʵÓá£

¹Ø¼ü´Ê£ºÑÎ¼î³ØÌÁ£»Ë®Þ³²Ë¸¡´²£»ÉúÎïÐõÍÅ£»ÌÇÃÛ£»Ë®ÖÊ£»¸¡ÓÎÉúÎï

II

Vvv Summary

To study the effects of Ipomoea aquatica floating-bed and adding carbon resource (molasses) on water quality and plankton of the saline-alkaline ponds in the northwest China in fish-vegetable and bio-floc technology. We have conducted different coverage rate of Ipomoea aquatica floating-bed (5% and 10%) on two treatment fish ponds, and added the molasses 100%, 75% and 50% of the theoretical added amount to three treatment fish ponds from May to September, aimed at providing some technical reference and basic information of this two technologies applicated in saline-alkaline ponds in the northwest of China. The main results are summarized as follows:

(1) With the Ipomoea aquatica floating-bed building in ponds, the transparency of the water was inproved obviously, made dissolved oxygen stayed at above 3 mg/L, but have less impact on temperature, pH value and electrical conductivity in ponds. The highest removal rate of NH4+-N, NO3--N, NO2--N, TN, TP and COD in treatment ponds was 58.2%, 34.8%, 53.8%, 9.46%, 39.3% and 31.3%, respectively. The average concentration of NH4+-N, NO3--N, NO2--N, TN, TP and COD in treatment ponds were both significantly (P<0.05) lower than the control pond.

The density and biomass of phytoplankton, the density of zooplankton in treatment ponds were both significantly (P<0.05) lower than the control pond, but the biomass of of zooplankton was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the control pond. The Shannon-Weaver diversity and Pielou evenness index of phytoplankton were both significantly (P<0.05) higher than the control pond. The Shannon-Weaver diversity and Pielou evenness index of zooplankton in treatment 10% pond was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the control pond.

Different coverage rate of Ipomoea aquatica floating-bed can effectively improved the water quality, but the treatment 10% was better than the treatment 5%.

(2) Adding different amount of molasses to ponds could improve the transparency of the water, reduce the value of COD, but had no significantly impact

III

Vvv on the concentration of TP of the water. The concentration of NH4+-N, NO3--N, NO2--N of three treatment ponds decreased respectively by 58.20%¡¢77.48%¡¢39.81% and 25.71%¡¢31.42%¡¢21.92% and 52.94%¡¢76.19%¡¢47.82%, which was significantly different.

The density of cyanobacteria in treatment ponds ranged from 812.5¡Á104 to 1263.0¡Á104 ind./L and the biomass ranged from 25.34 to 54.31 mg/L, correspondingly, the density of cyanobacteria in control pond ranged from 1079.2¡Á104 to 1216.5¡Á104 ind./L and the biomass ranged from 34.01 to 58.54 mg/L, which was significantly (P<0.05) different. The Shannon-Weaver diversity of zooplankton of treatment 100% and 75% decreased by 15.18% and 16.83%, and it was significantly (P<0.05) lower than the control pond which decreased by 32.56%.

Adding with 100% and 75% of the theoretical amount of the molasses to pond, the concentration of some harmful substances decreased£¬cyanobacteria reproduction controlled, the biodiversity of plankton increased, the water quality could be improved effectively, the treatment adding molasses with 75% of the theoretical added amount is more economical and practical.

Key words£ºsaline-alkaline ponds; Ipomoea aquatica floating-bed; biological floc; molasses; water quality; plankton

IV

ÁªÏµ¿Í·þ£º779662525#qq.com(#Ìæ»»Îª@)