5.31. Ongoing process verification should be conducted under an approved protocol or equivalent documents and a corresponding report should be prepared to document the results obtained. Statistical tools should be used, where appropriate, to support any conclusions with regard to the variability and capability of a given process and ensure a state of control.
5.31. ³ÖÐøÐÔ¹¤ÒÕÈ·ÈÏÓ¦ÔÚÓ¦Åú×¼µÄ·½°¸»òµÈͬÎļþµÄÖ¸µ¼Ï½øÐУ¬Í¬Ê±Ó¦µ±×¼±¸Ò»¸öÏàÓ¦µÄ±¨¸æÀ´½«»ñÈ¡µÄ½á¹ûÎļþ»¯¡£Èç¹ûÐèÒªµÄ»°£¬¿ÉÒÔʹÓÃͳ¼Æѧ¹¤¾ßÀ´¶Ô¼ÈÓй¤Òյı仯ºÍÐÔÄÜ×ö³öÅжϣ¬ÒÔÈ·±£¹¤ÒÕ´¦ÓÚÊÜ¿Ø״̬¡£ 5.32. Ongoing process verification should be used throughout the product lifecycle to support the validated status of the product as documented in the Product Quality Review. Incremental changes over time should also be considered and the need for any additional actions, e.g. enhanced sampling, should be assessed.
5.32. Á¬Ðø¹¤ÒÕÈ·ÈÏÓ¦ÔÚ²úÆ·ÉúÃüÖÜÆÚÖнøÐУ¬³ä·Ö¿¼ÂÇËæ×Åʱ¼äµÝÔöµÄ±ä»¯Çé¿ö£¬ÆÀ¹À²ÉÈ¡¸½¼Ó´ëÊ©µÄ±ØÒªÐÔ£¨ÈçÔö¼ÓÈ¡Ñù£©£¬ÒÔÖ¤Ã÷¹¤ÒÕ´¦ÔÚ²úÆ·ÖÊÁ¿»Ø¹ËÖÐËùÊöµÄÑé֤״̬¡£
6. VERIFICATION OF TRANSPORTATION 6. ÔËÊäÈ·ÈÏ
6.1. Finished medicinal products, investigational medicinal products, bulk product and samples should be transported from manufacturing sites in accordance with the conditions defined in the marketing authorisation, the approved label, product specification file or as justified by the manufacturer. 6.1. ³ÉÆ·Ò©Îï¡¢ÁÙ´²Ñо¿ÓÃÒ©¡¢´ó×ÚÔÁÏÒ©¼°ÑùÆ·Ó¦´ÓÉú²úÉÌ°´ÕÕÉÏÊÐÐí¿É¹æ¶¨µÄÌõ¼þ¡¢Åú×¼µÄ±êÇ©¡¢ÖÊÁ¿±ê×¼»òÉú²úºÏ¸ñÖ¤½øÐз¢ÔË¡£
6.2. It is recognised that verification of transportation may be challenging due to the variable factors involved however, transportation routes should be clearly defined. Seasonal and other variations should also be considered during verification of transport
6.2. ÓÉÓÚ¸÷Öֱ仯ÐÔÒòËØ£¬¶ÔÔËÊäÈ·ÈϽøÐÐÌôÕ½ÐÔÊÔÑéÒѳÉΪ¹²Ê¶£¬²¢ÇÒÃ÷È·ÔËÊäÏß·¡£ÔÚÔËÊäÈ·ÈÏÖУ¬Ó¦µ±¿¼ÂǼ¾½ÚºÍÆäËû±ä»¯ÒòËضÔÔËÊäµÄÓ°Ïì¡£ 6.3. A risk assessment should be performed to consider the impact of variables in the transportation process other than those conditions which are
µÚ 19 Ò³ ¹²32 Ò³
continuously controlled or monitored, e.g. delays during transportation, failure of monitoring devices, topping up liquid nitrogen, product susceptibility and any other relevant factors.
6.3. Ó¦µ±¶ÔÔËÊä¹ý³ÌÖгýÁ˳ÖÐøÊÜ¿Ø»ò¼à²âµÄÌõ¼þÒÔÍâµÄ±äÁ¿ÒòËصÄÓ°Ïì½øÐзçÏÕÆÀ¹À£¬±ÈÈ磺ÔËÊäÑÓ³Ù¡¢¼à¿ØÉ豸ʧЧ¡¢Òºµª²¹³ä¡¢²úÆ·Ãô¸ÐÐÔºÍÆäËûÏà¹ØÒòËØ¡£
6.4. Due to the variable conditions expected during transportation, continuous monitoring and recording of any critical environmental conditions to which the product may be subjected should be performed, unless otherwise justified. 6.4. ¶ÔÓÚÔËÊä¹ý³ÌÖÐÒÑÖªµÄ»·¾³±ä»¯£¬²úÆ·¿ÉÄÜÃæ¶ÔµÄÈκιؼü»·¾³ÒòËض¼Ó¦³ÖÐøÊܿز¢¼Ç¼£¬·ñÔòӦ˵Ã÷ÀíÓÉ¡£ 7. VALIDATION OF PACKAGING 7. °ü×°ÑéÖ¤
7.1. Variation in equipment processing parameters especially during primary packaging may have a significant impact on the integrity and correct functioning of the pack, e.g. blister strips, sachets and sterile components, therefore primary and secondary packaging equipment for finished and bulk products should be qualified.
7.1. ÓÉÓÚÉ豸²ÎÊýµÄ±ä»¯¶Ô»ù´¡°ü×°µÄÍêÕûÐÔºÍÕýÈ·ÐÔÓÐÖØÒªÓ°Ï죬±ÈÈçÂÁËÜÌõÐΰü×°¡¢Ð¡´üºÍÎÞ¾ú²¿¼þ£¬Òò´ËÓÃÓÚ×îÖÕ²úÆ·ºÍÖмä²úÆ·µÄ³õ¼¶ºÍ´Î¼¶°ü×°É豸ÐèÒª½øÐÐÈ·ÈÏ¡£
7.2. Qualification of the equipment used for primary packing should be carried out at the minimum and maximum operating ranges defined for the critical process parameters such as temperature, machine speed and sealing pressure or for any other factors.
7.2. ³õ¼¶°ü×°É豸µÄÈ·ÈÏÓ¦°üº¬¹Ø¼ü¹¤ÒÕ²ÎÊý²Ù×÷·¶Î§µÄÉÏÏÂÏÞ£¬±ÈÈçζȡ¢×ªËÙ¡¢ÃÜ·âѹÁ¦¼°ÆäËûÏà¹ØÒòËØ¡£ 8. QUALIFICATION OF UTILITIES 8. ¹«Óù¤³ÌµÄÈ·ÈÏ
8.1. The quality of steam, water, air, other gases etc. should be confirmed following installation using the qualification steps described in section 3 above. 8.1. ÕôÆû¡¢ÖÆÒ©ÓÃË®¡¢¿ÕÆø¼°ÆäËûÆøÌåµÈ£¬Ó¦°´ÕÕ±¾ÎĵÚ3½ÚËùÊöµÄ²½Öè½øÐÐÈ·
µÚ 20 Ò³ ¹²32 Ò³
ÈÏ¡£
8.2. The period and extent of qualification should reflect any seasonal variations, if applicable, and the intended use of the utility.
8.2. Èç¹ûÊÊÓõĻ°£¬È·ÈϵÄÖÜÆںͳ̶ÈÓ¦µ±·´Ó³Èκμ¾½ÚÐԱ仯ºÍ¹«Óù¤³ÌµÄÔ¤ÆÚÓÃ;¡£
8.3. A risk assessment should be carried out where there may be direct contact with the product, e.g. heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, or indirect contact such as through heat exchangers to mitigate any risks of failure.
8.3. Ó¦µ±¶Ô¼ÓÈÈ¡¢Í¨·ç¡¢¿Õµ÷ϵͳµÈÓë²úÆ·Ö±½Ó½Ó´¥µÄ½éÖÊ»ò»»ÈÈÆ÷µÈ²»Ö±½Ó½Ó´¥²úÆ·µÄ½éÖʽøÐзçÏÕÆÀ¹ÀÒÔ½µµÍʧ°ÜµÄ·çÏÕ¡£ 9. VALIDATION OF TEST METHODS 9. ¼ìÑé·½·¨ÑéÖ¤
9.1. All analytical test methods used in qualification, validation or cleaning exercises should be validated with an appropriate detection and quantification limit, where necessary, as defined in Chapter 6 of the EudraLex, Volume 4, Part I.
9.1. ÓÃÓÚÈ·ÈÏ¡¢ÑéÖ¤»òÇå½à»î¶¯ÖеÄÈκμìÑé·½·¨Ó¦µ±°´ÕÕµÚËľíµÚÒ»²¿·ÖµÚÁùÕ¹涨½øÐаüÀ¨¼ì²âÏ޺Ͷ¨Á¿ÏÞÔÚÄڵķÖÎö·½·¨ÑéÖ¤¡£
9.2. Where microbial testing of product is carried out, the method should be validated to confirm that the product does not influence the recovery of microorganisms.
9.2. Èç¹û²úÆ·ÐèÒª×ö΢ÉúÎï²âÊÔ£¬ÄÇô¼ìÑé·½·¨ÐèÒª½øÐÐÑéÖ¤ÒÔÈ·±£²úÆ·²»»áÓ°Ïì΢ÉúÎïµÄ»ØÊÕÂÊ¡£
9.3. Where microbial testing of surfaces in clean rooms is carried out, validation should be performed on the test method to confirm that sanitising agents do not influence the recovery of microorganisms.
9.3. µ±½à¾»Çø×ö±íÃæ΢ÉúÎï¼ì²âʱ£¬¼ìÑé·½·¨ÐèÒª½øÐÐÑéÖ¤ÒÔÈ·±£Ïû¶¾¼Á²»»áÓ°Ïì΢ÉúÎï»ØÊÕÂÊ¡£
10. CLEANING VALIDATION 10. Çå½àÑéÖ¤
µÚ 21 Ò³ ¹²32 Ò³
10.1. Cleaning validation should be performed in order to confirm the effectiveness of any cleaning procedure for all product contact equipment. Simulating agents may be used with appropriate scientific justification. Where similar types of equipment are grouped together, a justification of the specific equipment selected for cleaning validation is expected.
10.1. Çå½àÑéÖ¤µÄÄ¿µÄÊÇΪÁËÈ·ÈÏÇå½à³ÌÐò¶Ô²úÆ·½Ó´¥É豸µÄÇå½àЧ¹û¡£¸ù¾Ý¿ÆѧºÏÀíµÄÆÀÅУ¬¿ÉÒÔʹÓÃÄ£ÄâÊÔ¼Á¡£Èç¹ûÏàͬÀàÐ͵ÄÉ豸×÷Ϊһ×é½øÐÐÑé֤ʱ£¬Ó¦µ±ËµÃ÷Ñ¡ÔñÌض¨É豸¿ªÕ¹Çå½àÑéÖ¤µÄÔÒò¡£
10.2. A visual check for cleanliness is an important part of the acceptance criteria for cleaning validation. It is not generally acceptable for this criterion alone to be used. Repeated cleaning and retesting until acceptable residue results are obtained is not considered an acceptable approach.
10.2. Çå½àÑéÖ¤ÖеÄÄ¿²â¼ì²é¸É¾»Óë·ñÊǿɽÓÊܱê×¼µÄÖØÒªÆÀÅÐÖ¸±ê£¬µ«Ö»½øÐÐÄ¿¼ìµÄ»°ÔòÊDz»³ä·ÖµÄ£¬Ò»°ã²»±»½ÓÊÜ¡£Öظ´Çå½àºÍÖظ´²âÊÔÖÁ²ÐÁôÎï´ïµ½ºÏ¸ñ±ê×¼Ò²±»ÈÏΪÊDz»ÄܽÓÊܵġ£
10.3. It is recognised that a cleaning validation programme may take some time to complete and validation with verification after each batch may be required for some products, e.g. investigational medicinal products. There should be sufficient data from the verification to support a conclusion that the equipment is clean and available for further use.
10.3. Íê³ÉÒ»¸öÇå½àÑéÖ¤³ÌÐòÐèÒªÒ»¶¨µÄʱ¼äÊÇÈ¡µÃ¹²Ê¶µÄ£¬¿ÉÄܲ¿·Ö²úÆ·£¨ÈçÁÙ´²ÊÔÑéÓòúÆ·£©ÔÚÿÅúÉú²ú½áÊøºóÐèÒª¶ÔÑéÖ¤½øÐÐÈ·ÈÏ¡£Ó¦´ÓÈ·ÈÏÖлñµÃ×ã¹»µÄÊý¾ÝÒÔÖ§³Ö¡°É豸Òѱ»Çå½à¸É¾»²¢ÇÒÂú×ãºóÐøʹÓᱵĽáÂÛ¡£
10.4. Validation should consider the level of automation in the cleaning process. Where an automatic process is used, the specified normal operating range of the utilities and equipment should be validated.
10.4. Çå½àÑéÖ¤Ó¦¿¼ÂÇÇå½à³ÌÐòµÄ×Ô¶¯»¯Ó¦ÓÃˮƽ£¬µ±²ÉÓÃ×Ô¶¯»¯³ÌÐòʱ£¬Ó¦µ±ÑéÖ¤¹«ÓÃϵͳºÍÉ豸ָÃ÷µÄÕý³£²Ù×÷·¶Î§¡£
10.5. For all cleaning processes an assessment should be performed to determine the variable factors which influence cleaning effectiveness and performance, e.g. operators, the level of detail in procedures such as rinsing times etc. If variable factors have been identified, the worst case situations should be used as the basis for cleaning validation studies.
µÚ 22 Ò³ ¹²32 Ò³